↓ Skip to main content

Green qualities in the neighbourhood and mental health – results from a longitudinal cohort study in Southern Sweden

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Green qualities in the neighbourhood and mental health – results from a longitudinal cohort study in Southern Sweden
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matilda Annerstedt, Per-Olof Östergren, Jonas Björk, Patrik Grahn, Erik Skärbäck, Peter Währborg

Abstract

Poor mental health is a major issue worldwide and causality is complex. For diseases with multifactorial background synergistic effects of person- and place- factors can potentially be preventive. Nature is suggested as one such positive place-factor. In this cohort study we tested the effect of defined green qualities (Serene, Space, Wild, Culture, Lush) in the environment at baseline on mental health at follow-up. We also studied interaction effects on mental health of those place factors and varied person factors (financial stress, living conditions, and physical activity).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 354 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 17%
Researcher 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 58 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 52 14%
Environmental Science 46 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 8%
Psychology 26 7%
Other 79 22%
Unknown 93 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,722,711
of 19,001,205 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,943
of 12,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,263
of 136,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,001,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.