You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol for a national, mixed-methods knowledge, attitudes and practices survey on non-communicable diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-961 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessandro R Demaio, Otgontuya Dugee, Gombodorj Amgalan, Elena Maximenco, Adiya Munkhtaivan, Silke Graeser, Tine Kryger, Janchiv Oyunbileg, Pekka Jousilahti, Maximilian De Courten, Palam Enkhtuya |
| Abstract |
Mongolia is undergoing rapid epidemiological transition with increasing urbanisation and economic development. The lifestyle and health of Mongolians are changing as a result, shown by the 2005 and 2009 STEPS surveys (World Health Organization's STEPwise Approach to Chronic Disease Risk Factor Surveillance) that described a growing burden of Non-Communicable Diseases and injuries (NCDs).This study aimed to assess, describe and explore the knowledge, attitudes and practices of the Mongolian adult population around NCDs in order to better understand the drivers and therefore develop more appropriate solutions to this growing disease burden. In addition, it aimed to provide data for the evaluation of current public health programs and to assist in building effective, evidence-based health policy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cameroon | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Psychology | 11 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,773
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,753
of 14,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,681
of 243,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#177
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.