You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimisation: defining and exploring a concept to enhance the impact of public health initiatives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0502-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luke Wolfenden, Katarzyna Bolsewicz, Alice Grady, Sam McCrabb, Melanie Kingsland, John Wiggers, Adrian Bauman, Rebecca Wyse, Nicole Nathan, Rachel Sutherland, Rebecca Kate Hodder, Maria Fernandez, Cara Lewis, Natalie Taylor, Heather McKay, Jeremy Grimshaw, Alix Hall, Joanna Moullin, Bianca Albers, Samantha Batchelor, John Attia, Andrew Milat, Andrew Bailey, Chris Rissel, Penny Reeves, Joanie Sims-Gould, Robyn Mildon, Chris Doran, Sze Lin Yoong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 32% |
| United States | 4 | 16% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Nepal | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
| Scientists | 7 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,687,972
of 23,796,227 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#384
of 1,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,800
of 460,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#18
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,796,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.