↓ Skip to main content

Research approvals iceberg: helping it melt away

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Research approvals iceberg: helping it melt away
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0434-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon E. Kolstoe, David Carpenter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 29%
Arts and Humanities 1 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Energy 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Other 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#13,134,899
of 16,525,952 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#664
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,898
of 382,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#82
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,525,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.