↓ Skip to main content

The NASSS framework for ex post theorisation of technology-supported change in healthcare: worked example of the TORPEDO programme

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
71 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The NASSS framework for ex post theorisation of technology-supported change in healthcare: worked example of the TORPEDO programme
Published in
BMC Medicine, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12916-019-1463-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seye Abimbola, Bindu Patel, David Peiris, Anushka Patel, Mark Harris, Tim Usherwood, Trisha Greenhalgh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Psychology 8 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Other 31 28%
Unknown 28 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
#693,353
of 18,891,791 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#527
of 2,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,489
of 404,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#58
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,891,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.