↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of an antiviral Iota-Carrageenan nasal spray: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study in volunteers with early symptoms of the common cold

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 3,108)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
3 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of an antiviral Iota-Carrageenan nasal spray: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study in volunteers with early symptoms of the common cold
Published in
Respiratory Research, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-11-108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ron Eccles, Christiane Meier, Martez Jawad, Regina Weinmüllner, Andreas Grassauer, Eva Prieschl-Grassauer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 20 14%
Other 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 37 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 8%
Chemistry 8 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 42 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#704,824
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#48
of 3,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,834
of 105,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.