Title |
Diagnosis of placental malaria in poorly fixed and processed placental tissue
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-016-1314-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yunhao Liu, Jennifer B. Griffin, Atis Muehlenbachs, Stephen J. Rogerson, Anya J. Bailis, Rajni Sharma, David J. Sullivan, Antoinette K. Tshefu, Sarah H. Landis, Jean-Marie M. Kabongo, Steve M. Taylor, Steven R. Meshnick |
Abstract |
Placental histopathology has been considered the gold standard for diagnosis of malaria during pregnancy. However, in under-resourced areas placental tissue is often improperly fixed and processed; the resulting formalin pigment is difficult to distinguish from malaria pigment. This study examines two alternative diagnostic methods: polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and a novel immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based method using an antibody against histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2). Placental histopathology from 151 pregnant women in Kinshasa was assessed by two blinded microscopists and compared with peripheral blood PCR and IHC for HRP2. The Cohen's kappa coefficients were calculated to assess the test agreement. The sensitivity and specificity of individual tests were calculated using PCR or IHC as the reference standard as well as latent class analysis (LCA). PCR and IHC correlated fairly well. The correlation between the two blinded microscopists was poor, as there was widespread formalin pigment. Using LCA, all of the tests had high specificities. The most sensitive test was IHC (67.7 %), with PCR as second-best (56.1 %). PCR and/or IHC are suitable diagnostics when the presence of formalin pigment substantially compromises placental histopathology. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 19% |
Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 21 | 36% |