↓ Skip to main content

Benefits and harm of systemic steroids for short‐ and long‐term use in rhinitis and rhinosinusitis: an EAACI position paper

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benefits and harm of systemic steroids for short‐ and long‐term use in rhinitis and rhinosinusitis: an EAACI position paper
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13601-019-0303-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerie Hox, Evelijn Lourijsen, Arnout Jordens, Kristian Aasbjerg, Ioana Agache, Isam Alobid, Claus Bachert, Koen Boussery, Paloma Campo, Wytske Fokkens, Peter Hellings, Claire Hopkins, Ludger Klimek, Mika Mäkelä, Ralph Mösges, Joaquim Mullol, Laura Pujols, Carmen Rondon, Michael Rudenko, Sanna Toppila‐Salmi, Glenis Scadding, Sophie Scheire, Peter‐Valentin Tomazic, Thibaut Van Zele, Martin Wagenmann, Job F. M. van Boven, Philippe Gevaert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 59 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Chemistry 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 62 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,472,188
of 25,340,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#51
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,896
of 472,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,340,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.