↓ Skip to main content

Consortium on Vulnerability to Externalizing Disorders and Addictions (cVEDA): A developmental cohort study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consortium on Vulnerability to Externalizing Disorders and Addictions (cVEDA): A developmental cohort study protocol
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12888-019-2373-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eesha Sharma, Nilakshi Vaidya, Udita Iyengar, Yuning Zhang, Bharath Holla, Meera Purushottam, Amit Chakrabarti, Gwen Sascha Fernandes, Jon Heron, Matthew Hickman, Sylvane Desrivieres, Kamakshi Kartik, Preeti Jacob, Madhavi Rangaswamy, Rose Dawn Bharath, Gareth Barker, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos, Chirag Ahuja, Pratima Murthy, Sanjeev Jain, Mathew Varghese, Deepak Jayarajan, Keshav Kumar, Kandavel Thennarasu, Debashish Basu, B. N. Subodh, Rebecca Kuriyan, Sunita Simon Kurpad, Kumaran Kalyanram, Ghattu Krishnaveni, Murali Krishna, Rajkumar Lenin Singh, L. Roshan Singh, Kartik Kalyanram, Mireille Toledano, Gunter Schumann, Vivek Benegal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Master 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Unspecified 11 6%
Researcher 10 5%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 82 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 13%
Unspecified 11 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 88 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,283,574
of 24,457,696 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#396
of 5,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,482
of 467,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#11
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,457,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.