You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical priority setting for universal health coverage: challenges in deciding upon fair distribution of health services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-016-0624-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ole F. Norheim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 4 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 126 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,039,554
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#720
of 4,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,073
of 324,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.