You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing alternative cholera vaccination strategies in Maela refugee camp: using a transmission model in public health practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-019-4688-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua Havumaki, Rafael Meza, Christina R. Phares, Kashmira Date, Marisa C. Eisenberg |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,262,015
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,387
of 7,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,366
of 458,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#21
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.