↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
50 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME)
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12967-019-02196-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Do-Young Kim, Jin-Seok Lee, Samuel-Young Park, Soo-Jin Kim, Chang-Gue Son

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 12%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 78 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Psychology 7 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 83 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#856,182
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#171
of 4,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,773
of 480,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#5
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.