You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Research funding impact and priority setting – advancing universal access and quality healthcare research in Malaysia
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12913-019-4072-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Weng Hong Fun, Sondi Sararaks, Ee Hong Tan, Kar Foong Tang, Diane Woei Quan Chong, Lee Lan Low, Roslinda Abu Sapian, S. Asmaliza Ismail, Suresh Kumar Govind, Siti Haniza Mahmud, Shahnaz Murad |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 3 | 33% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 13 | 19% |
Researcher | 10 | 15% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 13 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
Engineering | 5 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 19% |
Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,038,031
of 24,144,324 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,432
of 8,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,443
of 354,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#63
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,144,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.