You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Promoting healthy teenage behaviour across three European countries through the use of a novel smartphone technology platform, PEGASO fit for future: study protocol of a quasi-experimental, controlled, multi-Centre trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0958-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elisa Puigdomenech, Anne Martin, Alexandra Lang, Fulvio Adorni, Santiago Felipe Gomez, Brian McKinstry, Federica Prinelli, Laura Condon, Rajeeb Rashid, Maurizio Caon, Sarah Atkinson, Claudio L. Lafortuna, Valentina Ciociola, Janet Hanley, Lucy McCloughan, Conxa Castell, Mireia Espallargues |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 38% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 316 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 41 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 9% |
Researcher | 22 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 4% |
Other | 50 | 16% |
Unknown | 124 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 46 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 9% |
Psychology | 18 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 17 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
Other | 58 | 18% |
Unknown | 135 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,665,222
of 25,299,129 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#701
of 2,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,292
of 445,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#21
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,299,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.