↓ Skip to main content

In vivo/ex vivo efficacy of artemether–lumefantrine and artesunate–amodiaquine as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in children: an open label randomized controlled trial in…

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vivo/ex vivo efficacy of artemether–lumefantrine and artesunate–amodiaquine as first-line treatment for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in children: an open label randomized controlled trial in Burkina Faso
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12936-019-3089-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moussa Lingani, Léa Nadège Bonkian, Isidore Yerbanga, Adama Kazienga, Innocent Valéa, Hermann Sorgho, Jean Bosco Ouédraogo, Petronella Francisca Mens, Henk D. F. H. Schallig, Raffaella Ravinetto, Umberto d’Alessandro, Halidou Tinto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 33 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 37 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,655,993
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,614
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,480
of 467,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#73
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.