↓ Skip to main content

What is it like to use a BCI? – insights from an interview study with brain-computer interface users

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What is it like to use a BCI? – insights from an interview study with brain-computer interface users
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0442-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johannes Kögel, Ralf J. Jox, Orsolya Friedrich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 34 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 11%
Neuroscience 9 10%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Computer Science 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 38 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,452,699
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#106
of 1,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,271
of 478,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.