↓ Skip to main content

Update on peripheral mechanisms of pain: beyond prostaglandins and cytokines

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Update on peripheral mechanisms of pain: beyond prostaglandins and cytokines
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/ar3305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans-Georg Schaible, Andrea Ebersberger, Gabriel Natura

Abstract

The peripheral nociceptor is an important target of pain therapy because many pathological conditions such as inflammation excite and sensitize peripheral nociceptors. Numerous ion channels and receptors for inflammatory mediators were identified in nociceptors that are involved in neuronal excitation and sensitization, and new targets, beyond prostaglandins and cytokines, emerged for pain therapy. This review addresses mechanisms of nociception and focuses on molecules that are currently favored as new targets in drug development or that are already targeted by new compounds at the stage of clinical trials--namely the transient receptor potential V1 receptor, nerve growth factor, and voltage-gated sodium channels--or both.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 216 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 21%
Student > Master 34 15%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Other 17 8%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 15%
Neuroscience 22 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 5%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 48 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,617,602
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#220
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,693
of 121,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.