↓ Skip to main content

ICHD-3 is significantly more specific than ICHD-3 beta for diagnosis of migraine with aura and with typical aura

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Headache and Pain, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ICHD-3 is significantly more specific than ICHD-3 beta for diagnosis of migraine with aura and with typical aura
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s10194-019-1072-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl H. Göbel, Sarah C. Karstedt, Thomas F. Münte, Hartmut Göbel, Sebastian Wolfrum, Elena R. Lebedeva, Jes Olesen, Georg Royl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Professor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 16 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,762,769
of 25,400,630 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#664
of 1,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,577
of 473,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,400,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.