↓ Skip to main content

Effect and associated factors of a clinical pharmacy model in the incidence of medication errors (EACPharModel) in the Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe: study protocol for a stepped wedge randomized…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect and associated factors of a clinical pharmacy model in the incidence of medication errors (EACPharModel) in the Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe: study protocol for a stepped wedge randomized controlled trial (NCT03338725)
Published in
Trials, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3945-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Granados, A. Salazar-Ospina, J. P. Botero-Aguirre, A. F. Valencia-Quintero, N. Ortiz, P. Amariles

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 24 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 24 51%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,912,842
of 22,045,435 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#611
of 5,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,949
of 428,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#76
of 614 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,045,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 614 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.