You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reducing meat consumption by appealing to animal welfare: protocol for a meta-analysis and theoretical review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1264-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maya B. Mathur, Thomas N. Robinson, David B. Reichling, Christopher D. Gardner, Janice Nadler, Paul A. Bain, Jacob Peacock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Uganda | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 47 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Psychology | 9 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 49 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,880,448
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#300
of 2,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,516
of 469,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#8
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.