↓ Skip to main content

Species-specific differences in Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Besnoitia besnoiti seroprevalence in Namibian wildlife

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Species-specific differences in Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Besnoitia besnoiti seroprevalence in Namibian wildlife
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13071-019-3871-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Seltmann, Gereon Schares, Ortwin H. K. Aschenborn, Sonja K. Heinrich, Susanne Thalwitzer, Bettina Wachter, Gábor Á. Czirják

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 19 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#18,707,884
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#4,285
of 5,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#334,692
of 456,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#114
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.