↓ Skip to main content

Can clinical ethics committees be legitimate actors in bedside rationing?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can clinical ethics committees be legitimate actors in bedside rationing?
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0438-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morten Magelssen, Kristine Bærøe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Librarian 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 15 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 15 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,470,260
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#763
of 1,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,493
of 458,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#24
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.