↓ Skip to main content

Screening to prevent fragility fractures among adults 40 years and older in primary care: protocol for a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening to prevent fragility fractures among adults 40 years and older in primary care: protocol for a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1094-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Gates, Jennifer Pillay, Guylène Thériault, Heather Limburg, Roland Grad, Scott Klarenbach, Christina Korownyk, Donna Reynolds, John J. Riva, Brett D. Thombs, Gregory A. Kline, William D. Leslie, Susan Courage, Ben Vandermeer, Robin Featherstone, Lisa Hartling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 29 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Psychology 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 33 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,604,817
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,320
of 2,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,755
of 341,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#25
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.