You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-8061-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aidan Q. Innes, Greig Thomson, Mary Cotter, James A. King, Niels B. J. Vollaard, Benjamin M. Kelly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 66 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,213,825
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,977
of 17,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,789
of 481,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#174
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.