↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of factors affecting adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis amongst travellers from non-endemic countries

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of factors affecting adherence to malaria chemoprophylaxis amongst travellers from non-endemic countries
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12936-020-3104-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian Ahluwalia, Samantha K. Brooks, John Weinman, G. James Rubin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 42 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Chemistry 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 47 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,631,212
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,755
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,010
of 464,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#42
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.