↓ Skip to main content

Gender difference in suicidal ideation and related factors among rural elderly: a cross-sectional study in Shandong, China

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of General Psychiatry, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender difference in suicidal ideation and related factors among rural elderly: a cross-sectional study in Shandong, China
Published in
Annals of General Psychiatry, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12991-019-0256-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lu Lu, Lingzhong Xu, Xiaorong Luan, Long Sun, Jiajia Li, Wenzhe Qin, Jiao Zhang, Xiang Jing, Yali Wang, Yu Xia, Yaozu Li, An’an Jiao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Lecturer 4 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 44 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 18%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 46 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#15,066,961
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Annals of General Psychiatry
#269
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,720
of 456,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of General Psychiatry
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.