↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the effectiveness of lectures based on problems and traditional lectures in physiology teaching in Sudan

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the effectiveness of lectures based on problems and traditional lectures in physiology teaching in Sudan
Published in
BMC Medical Education, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12909-019-1799-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nouralsalhin Abdalhamid Alaagib, Omer Abdelaziz Musa, Amal Mahmoud Saeed

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 249 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Lecturer 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Student > Postgraduate 10 4%
Other 51 20%
Unknown 103 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 7%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Arts and Humanities 6 2%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 109 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,705,361
of 24,503,376 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#435
of 3,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,728
of 349,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#11
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,503,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.