↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating a digital tool for supporting breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial protocol (ADAPT)

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating a digital tool for supporting breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial protocol (ADAPT)
Published in
Trials, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3971-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Lidington, Sophie E McGrath, Jillian Noble, Susannah Stanway, Amanda Lucas, Kabir Mohammed, Winette van der Graaf, Olga Husson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 14 10%
Unspecified 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 43 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Unspecified 14 10%
Psychology 8 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 44 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,523,008
of 16,713,463 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#539
of 4,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,894
of 386,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#76
of 602 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,713,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 602 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.