↓ Skip to main content

Participatory ethnobotany and conservation: a methodological case study conducted with quilombola communities in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Participatory ethnobotany and conservation: a methodological case study conducted with quilombola communities in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13002-019-0352-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eliana Rodrigues, Fernando Cassas, Bruno Esteves Conde, Crenilda da Cruz, Eduardo Hortal Pereira Barretto, Ginacil dos Santos, Glyn Mara Figueira, Luiz Felipe Domingues Passero, Maria Alice dos Santos, Maria Angélica Silva Gomes, Priscila Matta, Priscila Yazbek, Ricardo José Francischetti Garcia, Silvestre Braga, Sonia Aragaki, Sumiko Honda, Thamara Sauini, Viviane S. da Fonseca-Kruel, Tamara Ticktin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Researcher 10 7%
Lecturer 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 50 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 16%
Environmental Science 16 12%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Arts and Humanities 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 53 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,151,186
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#102
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,908
of 475,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.