↓ Skip to main content

Multicenter evaluation of TB-SPRINT 59-Plex Beamedex®: accuracy and cost analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multicenter evaluation of TB-SPRINT 59-Plex Beamedex®: accuracy and cost analysis
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12879-019-4646-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regina Bones Barcellos, Isabela Neves de Almeida, Elisangela Costa da Silva, Harrison Magdinier Gomes, Lida Jouca de Assis Figueredo, Maria Laura Halon, Elis Regina Dalla Costa, Ícaro Rodrigues dos Santos, Maria Cláudia Vater, Suely Alves, Wânia da Silva Carvalho, Philip Suffys, Christophe Sola, Silvana Spíndola de Miranda, Maria Lucia Rossetti, Afrânio Kritski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#18,046,378
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,190
of 7,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,090
of 459,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#122
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.