You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of traditional food and health strategies among Taiwanese and Chinese immigrants in Atlanta, Georgia, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-9-61 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandy Jiang, Cassandra L Quave |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 21% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 22% |
| Unknown | 29 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,198,089
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#22
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,302
of 200,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.