↓ Skip to main content

Diverse approaches to predicting drug-induced liver injury using gene-expression profiles

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diverse approaches to predicting drug-induced liver injury using gene-expression profiles
Published in
Biology Direct, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13062-019-0257-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Rex Sumsion, Michael S. Bradshaw, Jeremy T. Beales, Emi Ford, Griffin R. G. Caryotakis, Daniel J. Garrett, Emily D. LeBaron, Ifeanyichukwu O. Nwosu, Stephen R. Piccolo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 15%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,470,260
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#337
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,960
of 456,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.