↓ Skip to main content

Does phone messaging improves tuberculosis treatment success? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does phone messaging improves tuberculosis treatment success? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12879-020-4765-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kassahun Dessie Gashu, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye, Zeleke Abebaw Mekonnen, Richard Lester, Binyam Tilahun

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 12%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 93 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Unspecified 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 102 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,938,656
of 23,186,937 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,125
of 7,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,080
of 456,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#74
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,186,937 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.