↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Critical Care, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/cc3749
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jack JM Ligtenberg, L Gert Arnold, Ymkje Stienstra, Tjip S van der Werf, John HJM Meertens, Jaap E Tulleken, Jan G Zijlstra

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 147 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Other 19 12%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 43 28%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 15%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 24 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,524,254
of 12,287,089 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,289
of 3,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,643
of 276,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#107
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,287,089 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.