↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of patient involvement in a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data in cervical cancer treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of patient involvement in a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data in cervical cancer treatment
Published in
Systematic Reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-1-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire L Vale, Jayne F Tierney, Nicolette Spera, Andrea Whelan, Alison Nightingale, Bec Hanley

Abstract

In April 2005, researchers based at the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, set out to involve women affected by cervical cancer in a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data to evaluate treatments for this disease. Each of the women had previously been treated for cervical cancer. Following completion of the meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the process of involvement from the researcher and research partner perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 22%
Social Sciences 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Psychology 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#14,144,226
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,488
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,213
of 163,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.