↓ Skip to main content

Patch: platelet transfusion in cerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patch: platelet transfusion in cerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial
Published in
BMC Neurology, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-10-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koen de Gans, Rob J de Haan, Charles B Majoie, Maria M Koopman, Anneke Brand, Marcel G Dijkgraaf, Marinus Vermeulen, Yvo B Roos

Abstract

Patients suffering from intracerebral haemorrhage have a poor prognosis, especially if they are using antiplatelet therapy. Currently, no effective acute treatment option for intracerebral haemorrhage exists. Limiting the early growth of intracerebral haemorrhage volume which continues the first hours after admission seems a promising strategy. Because intracerebral haemorrhage patients who are on antiplatelet therapy have been shown to be particularly at risk of early haematoma growth, platelet transfusion may have a beneficial effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Canada 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 65 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Other 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Other 20 28%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,775,152
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#156
of 2,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,261
of 105,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.