↓ Skip to main content

Is a Calorie Really a Calorie? Metabolic Advantage of Low-Carbohydrate Diets

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
pinterest
1 Pinner
video
6 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is a Calorie Really a Calorie? Metabolic Advantage of Low-Carbohydrate Diets
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, May 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-1-2-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anssi H Manninen

Abstract

The first law of thermodynamics dictates that body mass remains constant when caloric intake equals caloric expenditure. It should be noted, however, that different diets lead to different biochemical pathways that are not equivalent when correctly compared through the laws of thermodynamics. It is inappropriate to assume that the only thing that counts in terms of food consumption and energy balance is the intake of dietary calories and weight storage. Well-controlled studies suggest that calorie content may not be as predictive of fat loss as is reduced carbohydrate consumption. Biologically speaking, a calorie is certainly not a calorie. The ideal weight loss diet, if it even exists, remains to be determined, but a high-carbohydrate/low-protein diet may be unsatisfactory for many obese individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 111 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 20%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Other 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 17%
Sports and Recreations 17 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2023.
All research outputs
#815,738
of 25,501,527 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#217
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,239
of 445,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#204
of 856 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,501,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 856 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.