You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Healthy Options: study protocol and baseline characteristics for a cluster randomized controlled trial of group psychotherapy for perinatal women living with HIV and depression in Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7907-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary C. Smith Fawzi, Hellen Siril, Elysia Larson, Zenaice Aloyce, Ricardo Araya, Anna Kaale, Janeth Kamala, Muhummed Nadeem Kasmani, Amina Komba, Anna Minja, Angelina Mwimba, Fileuka Ngakongwa, Magreat Somba, Christopher R. Sudfeld, Sylvia F. Kaaya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 349 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 10% |
| Researcher | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 16% |
| Unknown | 146 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 13% |
| Psychology | 44 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Unknown | 151 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#17,282,440
of 25,389,532 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,320
of 17,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,902
of 476,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#224
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,532 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.