You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparison of BMP2 delivery by coacervate and gene therapy for promoting human muscle-derived stem cell-mediated articular cartilage repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13287-019-1434-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xueqin Gao, Haizi Cheng, Hassan Awada, Ying Tang, Sarah Amra, Aiping Lu, Xuying Sun, Guijin Lv, Charles Huard, Bing Wang, Xiaohong Bi, Yadong Wang, Johnny Huard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#18,047,943
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#1,620
of 2,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,293
of 459,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#43
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.