You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Joining forces: the need to combine science and ethics to address problems of validity and translation in neuropsychiatry research using animal models
|
---|---|
Published in |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, January 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13010-019-0085-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Franck L. B. Meijboom, Elzbieta Kostrzewa, Cathalijn H. C. Leenaars |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 3 | 30% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 10% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
Portugal | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 50% |
Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 6 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Psychology | 3 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 23% |
Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,047,679
of 24,837,702 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#118
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,370
of 465,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,702 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.