You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What evidence exists on the impact of agricultural practices in fruit orchards on biodiversity? A systematic map
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-020-0185-z |
| Authors |
Markus van der Meer, Sonja Kay, Gisela Lüscher, Philippe Jeanneret |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 15% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,237,599
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#159
of 302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,828
of 452,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.