↓ Skip to main content

Association between anthraquinone laxatives and colorectal cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between anthraquinone laxatives and colorectal cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-1280-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niccolò Lombardi, Alessandra Bettiol, Giada Crescioli, Valentina Maggini, Eugenia Gallo, Francesco Sivelli, Francesco Sofi, Gian Franco Gensini, Alfredo Vannacci, Fabio Firenzuoli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,674,069
of 19,001,205 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,070
of 1,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,689
of 349,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,001,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them