↓ Skip to main content

Hypoglycemic and antilipidemic properties of kombucha tea in alloxan-induced diabetic rats

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 3,982)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
14 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypoglycemic and antilipidemic properties of kombucha tea in alloxan-induced diabetic rats
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-12-63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed Aloulou, Khaled Hamden, Dhouha Elloumi, Madiha Bou Ali, Khaoula Hargafi, Bassem Jaouadi, Fatma Ayadi, Abdelfattah Elfeki, Emna Ammar

Abstract

Diabetes has become a serious health problem and a major risk factor associated with troublesome health complications, such as metabolism disorders and liver-kidney dysfunctions. The inadequacies associated with conventional medicines have led to a determined search for alternative natural therapeutic agents. The present study aimed to investigate and compare the hypoglycemic and antilipidemic effects of kombucha and black tea, two natural drinks commonly consumed around the world, in surviving diabetic rats.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 347 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 69 20%
Student > Master 36 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 7%
Researcher 23 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 4%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 141 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 5%
Chemistry 11 3%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 154 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 282. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#127,270
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#20
of 3,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#509
of 176,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.