You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping the distribution of packing topologies within protein interiors shows predominant preference for specific packing motifs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-12-195 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sankar Basu, Dhananjay Bhattacharyya, Rahul Banerjee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 44% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 31% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,605,706
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,057
of 7,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,481
of 112,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#41
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.