↓ Skip to main content

A strategy to increase adoption of locally-produced, ceramic cookstoves in rural Kenyan households

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A strategy to increase adoption of locally-produced, ceramic cookstoves in rural Kenyan households
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-359
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin J Silk, Ibrahim Sadumah, Minal K Patel, Vincent Were, Bobbie Person, Julie Harris, Ronald Otieno, Benjamin Nygren, Jennifer Loo, Alie Eleveld, Robert E Quick, Adam L Cohen

Abstract

Exposure to household air pollutants released during cooking has been linked to numerous adverse health outcomes among residents of rural areas in low-income countries. Improved cookstoves are one of few available interventions, but achieving equity in cookstove access has been challenging. Therefore, innovative approaches are needed. To evaluate a project designed to motivate adoption of locally-produced, ceramic cookstoves (upesi jiko) in an impoverished, rural African population, we assessed the perceived benefits of the cookstoves (in monetary and time-savings terms), the rate of cookstove adoption, and the equity of adoption.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 118 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 13%
Social Sciences 15 12%
Environmental Science 14 11%
Engineering 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Other 31 25%
Unknown 29 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,793,870
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,548
of 16,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,266
of 169,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#49
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.