You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sample size issues in time series regressions of counts on environmental exposures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0894-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ben G. Armstrong, Antonio Gasparrini, Aurelio Tobias, Francesco Sera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 48% |
| Scientists | 11 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,289,436
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#311
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,265
of 477,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#15
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.