↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of neurodegenerative disease-causing genes in dementia with Lewy bodies

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of neurodegenerative disease-causing genes in dementia with Lewy bodies
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40478-020-0879-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatiana Orme, Dena Hernandez, Owen A. Ross, Celia Kun-Rodrigues, Lee Darwent, Claire E. Shepherd, Laura Parkkinen, Olaf Ansorge, Lorraine Clark, Lawrence S. Honig, Karen Marder, Afina Lemstra, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Peter St. George-Hyslop, Elisabet Londos, Henrik Zetterberg, Kevin Morgan, Claire Troakes, Safa Al-Sarraj, Tammaryn Lashley, Janice Holton, Yaroslau Compta, Vivianna Van Deerlin, John Q. Trojanowski, Geidy E. Serrano, Thomas G. Beach, Suzanne Lesage, Douglas Galasko, Eliezer Masliah, Isabel Santana, Pau Pastor, Pentti J. Tienari, Liisa Myllykangas, Minna Oinas, Tamas Revesz, Andrew Lees, Brad F. Boeve, Ronald C. Petersen, Tanis J. Ferman, Valentina Escott-Price, Neill Graff-Radford, Nigel J. Cairns, John C. Morris, Stuart Pickering-Brown, David Mann, Glenda Halliday, David J. Stone, Dennis W. Dickson, John Hardy, Andrew Singleton, Rita Guerreiro, Jose Bras

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 29 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 18 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 36 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,637,318
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#452
of 1,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,242
of 452,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#18
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.