You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What constitutes effective problematic substance use treatment from the perspective of people who are homeless? A systematic review and meta-ethnography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Harm Reduction Journal, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12954-020-0356-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah Carver, Nicola Ring, Joanna Miler, Tessa Parkes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 179 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 65 | 36% |
| United States | 20 | 11% |
| Canada | 13 | 7% |
| Ireland | 11 | 6% |
| Finland | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 67 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 127 | 71% |
| Scientists | 28 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 130 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 58 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Psychology | 13 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 185. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#221,757
of 25,889,720 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#32
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,649
of 477,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,889,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.