↓ Skip to main content

Tackling inequalities in obesity: a protocol for a systematic review of the effectiveness of public health interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity amongst children

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tackling inequalities in obesity: a protocol for a systematic review of the effectiveness of public health interventions at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in obesity amongst children
Published in
Systematic Reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-1-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare L Bambra, Frances C Hillier, Helen J Moore, Carolyn D Summerbell

Abstract

There is growing evidence of the impact of overweight and obesity on short- and long-term functioning, health and well-being. Internationally, childhood obesity rates continue to rise in some countries (for example, Mexico, India, China and Canada), although there is emerging evidence of a slowing of this increase or a plateauing in some age groups. In most European countries, the United States and Australia, however, socioeconomic inequalities in relation to obesity and risk factors for obesity are widening. Addressing inequalities in obesity, therefore, has a very high profile on the public health and health services agendas. However, there is a lack of accessible policy-ready evidence on what works in terms of interventions to reduce inequalities in obesity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 223 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 19%
Researcher 31 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 50 22%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 28%
Social Sciences 34 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 13%
Psychology 15 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 3%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 47 20%