You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EnROL: A multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-181 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin H Kennedy, Anne Francis, Susan Dutton, Sharon Love, Sarah Pearson, Jane M Blazeby, Philip Quirke, Peter J Franks, David J Kerr |
| Abstract |
During the last two decades the use of laparoscopic resection and a multimodal approach known as an enhanced recovery programme, have been major changes in colorectal perioperative care. Clinical outcome improves using laparoscopic surgery to resect colorectal cancer but until recently no multicentre trial evidence had been reported regarding whether the benefits of laparoscopy still exist when open surgery is optimized within an enhanced recovery programme. The EnROL trial (Enhanced Recovery Open versus Laparoscopic) examines the hypothesis that laparoscopic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme will provide superior postoperative outcomes when compared to conventional open resection of colorectal cancer within the same programme. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,549
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,099
of 8,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,247
of 163,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#35
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.